<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/">
<title>The White Peril 白禍</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:date>2008-06-25T14:06+00:00</dc:date>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1214402648.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208401607.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208089312.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1207553198.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1206078191.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205474273.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205301247.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1204024013.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1201863216.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1200378430.shtml" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1214402648.shtml">
<title>Go into the light</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1214402648.shtml</link>
<description>It's amazing what you can learn from American television....</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-25T14:06+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's amazing what you can learn from American television.<br />
<br />
The Discovery Channel has a show called <i>A Haunting</i>.  At first when I was flipping through the on-screen cable guide, I thought it was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunting_%281963_film%29"><i>The Haunting</i></a>, the wonderful '60s horror movie based on the Shirley Jackson novel <i>The Haunting of Hill House</i>.<br />
<br />
It was not.  Instead, it's a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Haunting">running program</a> in which couples relate how they were nearly driven from their dream houses by weird (in the original sense of the word) noises, apparitions, movements, and feelings of dread.<br />
<br />
This show makes me feel very inadequate.  At the end, the victims always bring in some medium/paranormal investigator type who goes into the attic bedroom and senses the presence of souls trapped there, usually after some grisly death long ago.  Imagine!  I'm so dense I can't even sense a mood of tension when I walk into a crowded room after an argument, and these people can pick up on the presence of invisible restless spirits.<br />
<br />
They also use sage a lot.  They tie it in bunches and burn it and walk through the house because, apparently, sage has spiritual cleansing properties.  Or maybe hostile spirits are calmer after some nice aromatherapy--I'm not sure.  It makes me wonder, though:  Suppose you don't have sage on hand?  Can you just substitute thyme and rosemary the way you do when you're making chicken, or do the ghosts get all angry at being faked out?]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208401607.shtml">
<title>Eeeeeven told the golden daaaaaffodilllll</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208401607.shtml</link>
<description>Eric doesn't like being labeled, and not for the usual tiresome I'm-too-free-spirited-to-be-defined reasons:...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-17T03:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Eric doesn't like being <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2008/04/why_im_a_nottat.html">labeled</a>, and not for the usual tiresome I'm-too-free-spirited-to-be-defined reasons:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>While I can say what I think about most things, experience shows that adopting any label invites conformity to it. (Especially criticism from those who claim it.)<br />
<br />
Once you say what you are, some a**hole will come along and say that you're not, because he is.<br />
<br />
Similarly, once you say what you aren't, some a**hole will come along and say that you are, because he <i>isn't</i>.</blockquote><br />
<br />
It's convenient that (small-<i>l</i>) "libertarian" suits me fine, because it tends not to set people off.  I like "classical liberal," but (today's left) liberals often seem to think you're trying to dress up as one of them while being a closet fascist.  ("Yeah, you're a liberal in the sense that, like, <i>Mill</i> would have meant it," someone sneered at me once.)  And while my positions on many issues align with what we now consider "conservatism," I'm not fundamentally a conservative.  (Well, I am when some gross guy is hitting on me.  Then I identify myself as a "conservative" in a clear, forceful tone and mention that I'm a registered Republican.  You movement conservatives don't mind the fib, do you?  It's to the end of preventing casual homosexual intercourse, after all.  And I really am a registered Republican.)<br />
<br />
The only problem with calling yourself a libertarian--besides, as Eric alludes to, being invited by supposed fellow travelers to engage in poker-faced debates over the most inane hypothetical situations imaginable--is that a lot of people don't understand that it doesn't mean "libertine" or "anarchist."  I can't count the number of times I've had to explain that no, I don't think all governing bodies should be dissolved so we can frolic naked in meadows all day and subsist on game and wild berries.  In general, though, even those who conclude I'm just a closet right-winger seem to give me a fair hearing without rancor.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
My buddy grabbed my arm the other night and asked whether I'd seen Julie Burchill's inevitable <a href="http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/celebrity/story/0,,2272092,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=users">column</a> about the new Madonna album yet.  He summarized it as "If I spent four hours a day at the gym, I'd look better than that bitch!"  Not too far wide of the mark:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Madonna is everywhere, reigning over the just and the unjust, friend and foe alike; loving her or hating her is as futile as loving or hating the rain, wind or snow - it'll happen anyway.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
If Madonna didn't devote her life to harassing us, what would she do with herself all day? Remember, this is a woman with so much time on her hands that she can spend four hours a day working out. I know I'm fat, but I have to say that if I spent four hours a day working out, I'd want to look a damn sight hotter than Madonna does; those vile veiny hands, that sad stringy neck - yuck!</blockquote><br />
<br />
Madonna has the sort of body that tends toward the plump/luscious side; you can see it in her early videos.  Endomorphs like that who diet and exercise themselves into having no body fat often end up with skin that has a weird stretched look.<br />
<br />
The rest of the column is the exact same thing Burchill writes whenever a Madonna record comes out, and it's as funny (and bawdy) as usual.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
Surprise!  Hillary Clinton once <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html">said</a> something nasty behind closed doors about white, working-class Southerners (via <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2008/04/screw-em-hillary-said-about-working.html">Ann Althouse</a>):<br />
<br />
<blockquote>In January 1995, as the Clintons were licking their wounds from the 1994 congressional elections, a debate emerged at a retreat at Camp David. Should the administration make overtures to working class white southerners who had all but forsaken the Democratic Party? The then-first lady took a less than inclusive approach.<br />
<br />
"Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."</blockquote><br />
<br />
And since some things never change, Clinton's spokesman responds with contempt when asked about the authenticity of the quotation:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>A spokesperson for Clinton said the quote was taken out of context and did not reflect her true political philosophy. "This quote differs from the recollection of others who were in the room at the time this comment was allegedly made," said Jay Carson. "To be clear, that's not how she felt then and it's not how she feels now, and the proof is in how she has lived her life, the work she has done and the policies she has pushed and pursued over the last 35 years."<br />
<br />
Asked to produce a witness who would say that Clinton had been misquoted, Carson wrote: "So, you've got two guys we've barely heard of remembering a verbatim quote from 13 years ago?... Sounds totally and completely reliable."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Remember the Clinton administration, when we were subjected to that kind of smear-and-spin routine almost daily when something or other threatened to blow up in the happy couple's faces?  We could be mere months from going back to it!<br />
<br />
Eric also <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2008/04/no_pain_no_gain.html">noticed</a> this story.  (He didn't say much about it, but, then, he had to go to New Jersey, so he had plenty of pain to contend with already.)<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
I don't think this post has enough parentheses.<br />
<!-- ping: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6493 -->]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208089312.shtml">
<title>Pack it and move it</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1208089312.shtml</link>
<description>Does anyone out there know where my evening shirt is?...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-13T12:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anyone out there know where my evening shirt is?<br />
<br />
Well, what good are you?<br />
<br />
I thought I always kept it inside the dinner jacket on the same hanger, but unless it's invisible, it's not there.  I hope I didn't leave it in Atsushi's closet when I moved out.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
How is it possible for one man to have so many <i>vases</i>?  If there were ever any doubt that I'm gay, it's been dispelled by the four boxes of decorative housewares I've just packed.  Mind you, they don't include anything you could eat off or store something in.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
It's time for me to break a pair of sunglasses.  Or maybe lose them.  I can feel it.  The weather keeps going from sunny to cloudy, so you need them sometimes and then not others.  They end up in a pocket or dangling by one slender arm from my bag.  I seem to have a thing for dropping them in cabs or putting them down on tables and putting something heavy on them.  I school myself resolutely to keep them in their little crush-proof cases, but it never works.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
I'm not entirely sure why, but I have <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Descent-Unrated-Widescreen-Shauna-Macdonald/dp/B000IHY9TS"><i>The Descent</i></a> in the DVD player, and I'm finding it oddly comforting to have it playing while I'm packing.  Given the increasing claustrophic-cave-like-ness of my apartment, you'd think it would make me afraid of confronting a throat-biting humanoid in the bathroom or something, but I actually find it rather cozy.  And I used to be of those people who were completely unable to handle horror movies.  (When I was growing up, all the talk of demons waiting to getcha we got in church affected my over-active imagination a good deal.)<br />
<br />
BTW, if you like suspense and have a strong stomach, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Descent-Unrated-Widescreen-Shauna-Macdonald/dp/B000IHY9TS"><i>The Descent</i></a> is a great little movie.  It's bloody and seriously scary at times, but you don't leave it feeling cynically worked over.  It's thoughtful and raises interesting questions without being pretentious, and the cave scenes are <i>very</i> persuasive even though they were all shot on a soundstage.  I love hypertrophied old Hollywood glamour-orgy productions as much as the next gay man, but there's a lot to be said for a movie made by people who relied on ingenuity, skill, and conviction rather than piles of money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1207553198.shtml">
<title>Verdant</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1207553198.shtml</link>
<description>I would have bought the lime green, Janis, for the wood sprite effect when out gardening. Then, too, if you garden in earnest (and why would you not?), the mud...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07T07:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would have bought the lime green, <a href="http://gonesouth.blogspot.com/2008/04/i-dont-shop-lot-but-when-lands-end.html">Janis</a>, for the wood sprite effect when out gardening.  Then, too, if you garden in earnest (and why would you not?), the mud and earth are likely to dull the color in short order.<br />
<br />
I wore a lime-green T-shirt to lunch with Atsushi yesterday.  We went to a putatively Moroccan restaurant, which turned out to be a French bistro-ish place (including the ham that came with the asparagus salad) in just about every respect except the figurines of camels and the baskets everywhere.  Anyway, the color comes into the story because we both got pea soup--chilled fresh pea soup that looked like bright-green vichyssoise.  When it arrived, Atsushi looked from my plate to my shirt to the (green) cushions and said, "You've certainly dressed for the place."  Then the waitress came to do something with the cutlery and started giggling.  "Same color," she said in English, looking at my place setting and me.<br />
<br />
Unlike Janis, I can't wear most V-necks.  I'm not worried about bra straps, obviously; it's just that when you have as much chest hair as I do, a deep V looks sleazy (in gay terms) or just plain wrong.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1206078191.shtml">
<title>Trust me when I say I know the pathway to your heart</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1206078191.shtml</link>
<description>The story's a good week old, but considering what old news it is anyway, I don't feel all that dumb linking to it now. R.E.M. has a new album out...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-27T05:03+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The story's a good week old, but considering what old news it is anyway, I don't feel all that dumb linking to it now.  R.E.M. has a <a href="http://www.remaccelerate.com/">new album</a> out soon, and the hype-o-rator has been on full-blast for weeks.  Who knows?  Maybe it really is the band's best album in over a decade, and old fans should be getting all spazzy with anticipation.  (Personally, I dropped away after <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Automatic-People-R-E-M/dp/B000002MG1"><i>Automatic for the People</i></a>, which to me is about as melodious and ear-pleasing as the reaction of a cat when you throw a bucket of ice water over it.  I'm clearly in the minority on that one, though.)<br />
<br />
Anyway, there's a usual flurry of interviews and photo shoots and magazine covers.  GayNews <a href="http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/rem-singer-michael-stipe-comes-out.html">reports</a> that Michael Stipe has finally just cut the crap and <a href="http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?section=66&id=18522">identified himself</a> as gay:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>This week he told <i>Spin</i> magazine, "I recognize that to have public figures be very open about their sexuality helps some kid somewhere out there."<br />
<br />
Although Stipe has never felt the need to discuss his sexuality before, he informed the magazine that he now felt that it was important to be open and honest in order to provide understanding and hope for the younger generation.<br />
<br />
"It was super complicated for me in the '80s. I was totally open with the band and my family and my friends and certainly the people I was sleeping with. I thought it was pretty obvious."<br />
<br />
Stipe stated that in the past he didn't see that being out could be so important for others. "I didn't always see that. But I see now, of course that's the case, of course that's needed."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Considering how fervently Stipe embraced everything else on the leftist checklist, it's kind of funny that he didn't see coming out of the closet, of all things, as being important.  But I see no reason not to take him at his word.  He did, after all, make a point of being uncategorizable and enigmatic about his private life--and why not?--and he's been open about being bisexual for years.  If he's decided he is, in fact, gay, then sure, no reason he shouldn't be up-front about it with the public if he likes.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure the announcement will have the effect of "helping some kid out there," though.  Gay kids already know that it's possible to be an open homosexual if, like Stipe, you're constantly going to be pushing what a "transgressive" weirdo you are.  Especially if you've also already made a pile and aren't risking much in the way of money and career trajectory.  I'm not faulting Stipe for waiting until he was ready to reveal this or that about himself; I'm only saying that it's a bit late to be all public-spirited about it in the way he seems to want to be.<br />
<br />
BTW, before anyone tries to call me on it:  Yes, the joke of the post title is that "Superman" was neither written by R.E.M. nor sung by Michael Stipe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205474273.shtml">
<title>Our betters</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205474273.shtml</link>
<description>Overheard at the bar the other night, spoken between two always-loud friends from the same part of the British Isles:...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-14T05:03+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Overheard at the bar the other night, spoken between two always-loud friends from the same part of the British Isles:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Well, I get both CNN and the BBC, you know, and I always think--well, let me put it this way:  CNN is <i>entertainment</i>, and the BBC is <i>news</i>."<br />
<br />
"Oh, very <i>much</i> so.  By the way, isn't that weather guy...Rob Mar...Mar...."<br />
<br />
"Marciano!  A real hottie!"<br />
<br />
"Can't get enough of him!"</blockquote><br />
<br />
To impress upon his mate (and, I'm fairly certain, everyone within earshot--he's that type) the seriousness of the distinction, Speaker 1 drew out the word <i>news</i> with suitable fake-RP/genuine-gasbag portentousness: <i>nee-yeeewwwwwz</i>.<br />
<br />
I'm usually very good about not chortling audibly in such situations, but I happened to be sitting with my English buddy, with whom I e-mail news stories and things back and forth frequently through the day.  I made the mistake of catching his eye.  At that point, it was over.<br />
<br />
Of course, it wasn't the novelty of the opinions expressed that I found funny.  I've heard that kind of nonsense many times before.  But it's still nonsense.<br />
<br />
I have little objection to the characterization of CNN as a source of mere entertainment, given that its "in-depth coverage" is like <i>World Book Encyclopedia</i> come to life:  all cutesy-poo visuals and repellantly chipper presentation, presumably calibrated to reassure the mass audience that it will not be confronted with anything too complicated, taxing to the intellect, or challenging to existing assumptions.<br />
<br />
I just don't see how the BBC--especially BBC World, which has notably CNN-ified itself over the years--can be thought to bring anything more elevated to the mix.  It's not that the BBC is <i>worse</i>.  For one thing, the reporters don't do as much of that gruesome, would-be-matey joshing with one another as they do on American channels.  (Is there <i>no way</i> to make them cut that out?)  But you get the same pat, preconception-confirming reporting on stories that you get everywhere else.  You get the same "heartwarming" human interest pieces, which I sometimes think are purposefully contrived to make any civilized person's flesh crawl.  You get the same asinine patter made necessary by being on the air all day.  And you get the same unilluminating Q&A shows.  Even the <i>Hard Talk</i> guy, whatever his name is (if he were cuter I'd make more of an effort to remember), is more known for his confrontational-jerk style of delivering questions than for actually, you know, drawing better information out of his subjects than other interviewers do.<br />
<br />
At times I prefer the BBC because I find the cool composure of the newsreaders welcome.  Just spit out the story already.  At other times it's kind of nice the way CNN (as well as MSNBC) is populated by people who appear frankly aware that they're feeding you Spam on Wonder smeared with Miracle Whip Lite.  That probably says something about my native Yank preference for forthrightness.<br />
<br />
Just to end on a suitable note of (North) American frivolity:  Rondi <a href="http://wonkitties.blogspot.com/2008/03/rumour-has-it.html">thinks</a> Silda (Mrs. Eliot) Spitzer looks like Jennifer Aniston.  There's totally a Hollywood angle on everything if you just look hard enough!]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205301247.shtml">
<title>Over and over</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1205301247.shtml</link>
<description>Occasionally, the thought flits through my head that maybe Go Fug Yourself isn't quite as funny as I think it is. Then I start guffawing again and forget all about it....</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-12T05:03+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Occasionally, the thought flits through my head that maybe Go Fug Yourself isn't quite as funny as I think it is.  Then I start guffawing again and forget all about it.  <a href="http://gofugyourself.typepad.com/go_fug_yourself/2008/03/fugtify-my-love.html">This</a> is Heather's riff on one of the photo-op photos from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductions last night:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><center><a href="http://gofugyourself.typepad.com/go_fug_yourself/2008/03/fugtify-my-love.html"><img alt="igmaju.jpg" src="http://www.whiteperil.com/files/igmaju.jpg" /></a></center><br />
<br />
MADONNA: And the arms, they work, right? Young people have great arms. Justin probably has awesome arms. He's kind of my inspiration, actually. God, I just want to use my fearsome guns to tear off his young flesh and eat it.<br />
<br />
JUSTIN: I don't know why, but I'm suddenly afraid that Madonna is going to use her fearsome guns to tear off my young flesh and eat it.<br />
<br />
IGGY: I wonder what it'd taste like if I used Madonna's fearsome guns to tear off that kid's young flesh and eat it.</blockquote><br />
<br />
I'm still not sure how much of Madonna's strangeness of appearance is due to getting work done; a lot of it could be all the dieting and working out.  No question, though, that she's bringing the same determination to staying "youthful" that she did to becoming a star.  And (to bring up Taylor Dayne for the second time in a week) M. at least is working with her facial structure rather than <a href="http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/007676.html#7676">against</a> it.<br />
<br />
To see Madonna's continued ability to polarize people in action, refer to <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2008/03/thank-you-so-much-for-reminding-me-that.html#comments">this comment thread</a> at Ann Althouse's.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1204024013.shtml">
<title>It's Tuesday</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1204024013.shtml</link>
<description>The staff at my office here in Taipei have given me two different nicknames. I was designated "Evil Pink Guy" (by one of the fags, naturally--we're such bitches) the day I...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-26T11:02+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The staff at my office here in Taipei have given me two different nicknames.  I was designated "Evil Pink Guy" (by one of the fags, naturally--we're such bitches) the day I showed up in a lavender T-shirt and sat behind my desk with the lights off, apparently looking malign.  The girls up front, on the other hand, have decided I'm 型男.  No clue how to pronounce that in Chinese, but apparently it means "well-dressed man."<br />
<br />
I'm honestly not sure which one I prefer.  Being known as the Evil Pink Guy could, it seems to me, have its advantages.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
Hokkaido Diet member Muneo Suzuki, an uncommonly proficient glad-hander even by Japanese standards, has had one of his sentences <a href="http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200802260344.html">upheld</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote> The Tokyo High Court on Tuesday upheld a two-year prison sentence against Lower House member Muneo Suzuki, a once-powerful politician convicted of accepting 11 million yen in bribes and other crimes.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
Although prosecutors can incarcerate Suzuki, his lawyers have requested his release on bail, meaning the lawmaker will likely be able to continue his political activities.<br />
<br />
Under the Diet Law, lawmakers accused of bribery while in office lose their seats only when a guilty verdict is finalized.<br />
<br />
Suzuki, a former member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, once wielded enormous influence over the Foreign Ministry, particularly on Russian affairs, and publicly clashed with then Foreign Minister Makiko Tanaka during the Junichiro Koizumi administration.<br />
<br />
But his power eroded after he became embroiled in a series of money scandals.<br />
<br />
The lawmaker was found guilty of collecting 6 million yen from Shimada Kensetsu Co., a contractor based in Abashiri, Hokkaido, for his influence in gaining the company preferential treatment for a contract in a large-scale port construction project.</blockquote><br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
A town in Saga Prefecture <a href="http://mdn.mainichi.jp/national/news/20080226p2a00m0na003000c.html">has</a> a different (ahem) incentive plan in mind:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The Karatsu Municipal Government will from April start providing special bonuses to any citizens 75 or over who have not needed medical treatment or special health care over the previous 12 months.<br />
<br />
Healthy elderly Karatsu citizens will be able to receive a special 10,000 yen payment provided they are on the list the city draws up for entitled recipients and they decide to apply for it themselves.<br />
<br />
Karatsu's move to reward healthy older citizens is the first such step for a Japanese municipality.<br />
<br />
Karatsu is hoping the idea will catch on and encourage older people to look after their health to cut potential rises in medical costs as the city's population ages.</blockquote><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://mainichi.jp/seibu/archive/news/2008/02/26/20080226sog00m040002000c.html">original Japanese</a> for the program is ご長寿健康手当 (<i>go-chouju kenkou teate</i>:  "payment for health in [exalted] longevity"), but it sounds to me more patronizing than respectful.  Those who are already over 75 (or will be hitting 75 in the foreseeable future) are at a point at which there's not a whole lot they're likely to be able to do to affect which ailments they're prone to.  They can be extra careful not to fall and break fragile bones, I suppose, but their range of choices is going to be kind of limited.<br />
<br />
*******<br />
<br />
The new Janet is okay.  By which I mean the album.  The new Janet herself appears to have gone further toward Michael/LaToya-fying her nose.  Kind of spooky.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1201863216.shtml">
<title>How can I be sure?</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1201863216.shtml</link>
<description>This morning, for just about the first time in ten years, I got my hair cut by someone who's not my regular guy in Tokyo. He made me feel right at...</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-01T10:02+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This morning, for just about the first time in ten years, I got my hair cut by someone who's not my regular guy in Tokyo.  He made me feel right at home by putting gunk in my hair despite my telling him that I didn't need any.  He also had this idea that he was going to convince me to style it--there was this whole thing about using more gel on the sides than on the top and pushing it foward and down.  I think there was a blow-dryer involved somewhere.  Since he was recommended by a friend of mine down here (and had given me a good cut), I thought, but did not say, "Honey, I know we're Family, but you have to understand something:  I use the best degreasing shampoo I can get my hands on.  Then I towel my hair dry.  Then, if anything looks out of place, I finger comb it, kind of.  Once.  Anything more complicated than that, including applications of goo, is not happening."<br />
<br />
Speaking of high-maintenance hair, can you believe <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dusty_springfield">Dusty</a>'s been dead for almost a full decade?  Shelby Lynne has an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Just-Little-Lovin-Shelby-Lynne/dp/B000ZK53CA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1201863074&sr=1-2">album</a> out now of covers of her songs.  (Songs Dusty sang, of course, since she wasn't known for her songwriting.)  I'm trying to decide whether to buy it.  I like Lynne's voice, and though I tend to run headlong in the opposite direction from anything peddled as "alt-something," I recognize that it's probably not her fault that she gets icky marketing.  She also had the good taste to pick two of the best songs from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dusty-Memphis-Springfield/dp/B00000HZEQ/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1201863022&sr=8-1"><i>Dusty in Memphis</i></a> to cover, along with a third, without going for the obvious attention-getting gambit of making a beeline for "Son of a Preacher Man."<br />
<br />
Oh, why not?  I have one more long-ish commute to work tomorrow before Chinese New Year, and if it sucks, I can always recover my spirits by listening to the real thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1200378430.shtml">
<title>古池や</title>
<link>http://whiteperil.com/posts/1200378430.shtml</link>
<description>Work, busy, wontons, Chiang Kai-shek, blah-blah-blah. Will have more to report soon. Two quick notes on the latest (though now several days old) Camille column at Salon....</description>
<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-15T09:01+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Work, busy, wontons, Chiang Kai-shek, blah-blah-blah.  Will have more to report soon.  Two quick notes on the latest (though now several days old) Camille column at Salon.<br />
<br />
First, Jeff of Beautiful Atrocities got a letter <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/01/10/hillary/index4.html">published</a> and answered.  At least, you don't think there could be <i>another</i> Jeff Percifield who would begin with "Longtime fan here. As a Reaganite homo, couldn't disagree with you more on politics, but who cares?" and then go on to write about a Ukrainian drag queen, right?  Me, neither.<br />
<br />
Then there's <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/01/10/hillary/index2.html">this beyond-satire letter</a> about the Iraq occupation:<br />
<br />
<blockquote> Thank you for giving us a voice of reason before and during the Iraq war. At a time when many people resorted to clichés or did not speak out openly against the war, you made a strong case for peace. I also commend you for continuing to speak out against this pointless war.<br />
<br />
My thoughts about our world, expressed in Haiku form:<br />
<br />
    War afflicts our world<br />
    Random murder and bloodshed<br />
    The scourge of our time<br />
<br />
    No armies in ranks<br />
    Just sporadic explosions<br />
    Maiming and killing<br />
<br />
    Serving no purpose<br />
    Ending lives before their time.<br />
    When will peace arrive?<br />
<br />
Again, thank you on behalf of the Peace Party.</blockquote><br />
<br />
I'm not Japanese, so maybe it's not my place to say this, but on behalf of grown-ups everywhere...please don't say things in haiku that are better said in normal prose.  Please.  If you've had some kind of epiphanic experience in nature and feel stirred to write a haiku, fine.  That's right in line with the tradition.  In fact, that <i>is</i> the tradition.<br />
<br />
We use haiku in elementary school to teach second-graders about poetry because...well, it helps reinforce the concept of the syllable, it's a less confusing way to teach discipline and rules in composition than the sonnet, it introduces the idea that non-Western countries have very different poetic traditions, and most kids can find something about nature that they think it would be fun to write about.<br />
<br />
However, it is a mistake to believe in something one might call the Haiku Effect, that (it is assumed) simply expressing something in seventeen syllables on three lines somehow imbues it with major big-time profundity.  Pointless line breaks actually come off kind of kitschy, which presumably was not the intention here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>